|
|
Parents across the state are fighting for the School Survey Consent Bill
(S316) --
now before the Education Committee! Call them!

Testifying for the bill before the Education Committee at the public hearing on
Sept. 22
Current Status: Education Committee heard public testimony on Sept.
22. Will schedule an executive session this fall to decide fate of the
bill -- whether to pass it to the full Legislature or kill it.
What you need to do:
(1) Call the committee members (at office or at home), let them know why S316
is needed, and tell them NOT to kill it in committee.
(2) If possible, prepare your own testimony and mail it to the committee (and
send a copy to us).
Click here for Education Committee List,
phone
numbers, addresses, etc.
Last year, Donna Pasquarosa, a Newton mother, had had enough. After
enduring years of intrusive and inappropriate surveys given to her kids in the
public school system, she did the research to submit a bill before the
Legislature. She persuaded her state senator, liberal Cynthia Creem, to
file it for her. It is now S316, and would require written parental
consent prior to a student taking a survey. (See text of bill, and current status,
below.)
Surveys are often used as political tools, particularly by homosexual groups. Over the last several years, surveys given to
children in the public schools have become political tools for various special
interest groups to use justify their various social engineering programs aimed
at children. As a result, these surveys have become increasingly emotionally and
psychologically intrusive, and quite sexual in nature. In addition, schools
usually refuse to allow parents to see the surveys (and often don't even notify
them) before they are given to
their children.
Starting in the mid-1990's, the "results" of the Massachusetts Youth Risk
Behavior Survey has been used by homosexual groups across the country to "prove"
that kids are not safe unless more homosexual programs are used in the schools.
This dovetailed with their strategy of deceiving the public about the true
nature of the programs. (See
article here.)
Mass. Youth Risk Behavior Survey: a parent's nightmare! Given to kids across
Massachusetts as young as 12 years old, this is a parent's nightmare. Asks
incredibly intrusive questions. Used by gay lobby to "justify" their programs in
schools. Click here to
see it. You won't believe this is given to Mass. kids!
If you have a survey given at your child's school that this committee should
know about, please send it to us!
Mind games on kids. As the testimony brought out, there are many
serious problems with these surveys:
- Leading questions. Questions about "harassment" and other
topics that can be used by purveyors of social engineering programs.
We've been told of gay "clubs" encouraging kids to exaggerate on many of
these. These surveys are greatly used for political reasons.
- Emotional exploration of children's' minds. Questions are asked in
the context as if their peers are engaging in these activities. Kids are asked to
identify
their sexual orientation. What kind, and how many times they've engaged in
various types of sexual activity, illegal drug use and other criminal
activity. Their thoughts of suicide and self-mutilation.
- No follow-up when children become disturbed after stirring up deep
issues. One mother testified before the committee about her child becoming
emotionally distressed by the survey. (Of course, schools are not staffed with
people adequately trained for this.)
- Moral vacuum. Questions are asked to children in a manner
without regard for whether the behaviors are good or bad -- simply things
people do.
- Unreliable answers. Parents have reported kids talking among
themselves after having taken these tests, about how they lied on the
questions, as a joke.
- Statically flawed & meaningless. No real statistics expert
would consider these surveys as legitimate indicators. They are far too
amateurish -- the products of activists more than actual scientists or medical
authorities.
Other horror stories. Earlier this year, Mark Fisher, a father
from Shrewsbury, made national news when his 12-year-old daughter's sixth-grade
class was asked in a classroom survey: "Have you ever given or received oral
sex?" Mr. Fisher also
demanded to see the other questions, and the school refused to comply until great
pressure was brought on them by the publicity.
Two years ago, Newton North High School gave a school-wide survey to all
students during homeroom. Created by a national homosexual group, it contained
the following questions:
What is your biological sex? ___Female ___Male
Which of the following category or categories applies to you (Check all that
apply.)
__ bisexual __ gay __ heterosexual/straight
__ lesbian
__ transgender __ not sure __ other
relevant category(ies).
Do you consider yourself to be a person with a physical disability?
__ yes __ no __ not sure
So you consider yourself to be a person with a mental or emotional
disability?
__ yes __ no __ not sure
How do questions like these affect a child who's developing his own sense of
emotional identity? No one seems to care. These are actually cruel
experiments. We may not know for years how a child reacts to being asked
to answer these questions.
Text of Bill S316:
(Link to
official version on state website)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
------------------------------------
In the Year Two Thousand and Five.
------------------------------------
AN ACT Relative to School Surveys
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court
assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1.
Chapter 71 of the General laws, as appearing in the 2000 Official
Edition, is hereby amended by adding after section 32A the following new
section:-
32B. No student shall be required to submit to a survey, analysis, or
evaluation that reveals information concerning: (1) political
affiliations; (2) mental and psychological problems potentially
embarrassing to the student or his family; (3) sex behavior and
attitudes; (4) illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating and demeaning
behavior; (5) critical appraisals of other individuals with whom
respondents have close family relationships; (6) legally recognized
privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers,
physicians and ministers; or (7) income, other than that required by law
to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving
financial assistance under such program, without the prior consent of the
student, if the student is an adult or emancipated minor, or in the case
of an unemancipated minor, without the prior written consent of the
parent or guardian.
Lots of testimony at the State House in support of S316. At the September 22 public hearing at
the State House, one after another came and gave testimony, often very
emotional, before the Education Committee. No one came to testify against the
bill! But you can be sure that the opponents (i.e., the sex lobby and the
homosexual lobby) will be working behind the scenes to try to kill this.




|
|