Had enough? Citizens, take back your government!
 
 

Parents across the state are fighting for the School Survey Consent Bill (S316) -- now before the Education Committee!  Call them!


Testifying for the bill before the Education Committee at the public hearing on Sept. 22


Current Status: Education Committee heard public testimony on Sept. 22.  Will schedule an executive session this fall to decide fate of the bill -- whether to pass it to the full Legislature or kill it. 

What you need to do:

(1) Call the committee members (at office or at home), let them know why S316 is needed, and tell them NOT to kill it in committee.

(2) If possible, prepare your own testimony and mail it to the committee (and send a copy to us).

Click here for Education Committee List,
phone numbers, addresses, etc.

Last year, Donna Pasquarosa, a Newton mother, had had enough.  After enduring years of intrusive and inappropriate surveys given to her kids in the public school system, she did the research to submit a bill before the Legislature.  She persuaded her state senator, liberal Cynthia Creem, to file it for her.  It is now S316, and would require written parental consent prior to a student taking a survey. (See text of bill, and current status, below.)

Surveys are often used as political tools, particularly by homosexual groups. Over the last several years, surveys given to children in the public schools have become political tools for various special interest groups to use justify their various social engineering programs aimed at children. As a result, these surveys have become increasingly emotionally and psychologically intrusive, and quite sexual in nature. In addition, schools usually refuse to allow parents to see the surveys (and often don't even notify them) before they are given to their children.

Starting in the mid-1990's, the "results" of the Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Survey has been used by homosexual groups across the country to "prove" that kids are not safe unless more homosexual programs are used in the schools.  This dovetailed with their strategy of deceiving the public about the true nature of the programs. (See article here.)

Mass. Youth Risk Behavior Survey:  a parent's nightmare!  Given to kids across Massachusetts as young as 12 years old, this is a parent's nightmare. Asks incredibly intrusive questions. Used by gay lobby to "justify" their programs in schools.  Click here to see it. You won't believe this is given to Mass. kids!

If you have a survey given at your child's school that this committee should know about, please send it to us!

Mind games on kids.  As the testimony brought out, there are many serious problems with these surveys:

  • Leading questions.  Questions about "harassment" and other topics that can be used by purveyors of social engineering programs.  We've been told of gay "clubs" encouraging kids to exaggerate on many of these.  These surveys are greatly used for political reasons.
     
  • Emotional exploration of children's' minds. Questions are asked in the context as if their peers are engaging in these activities. Kids are asked to identify their sexual orientation. What kind, and how many times they've engaged in various types of sexual activity, illegal drug use and other criminal activity.  Their thoughts of suicide and self-mutilation.
     
  • No follow-up when children become disturbed after stirring up deep issues. One mother testified before the committee about her child becoming emotionally distressed by the survey. (Of course, schools are not staffed with people adequately trained for this.)
     
  • Moral vacuum.  Questions are asked to children in a manner without regard for whether the behaviors are good or bad -- simply things people do.
     
  • Unreliable answers. Parents have reported kids talking among themselves after having taken these tests, about how they lied on the questions, as a joke.
     
  • Statically flawed & meaningless.  No real statistics expert would consider these surveys as legitimate indicators. They are far too amateurish -- the products of activists more than actual scientists or medical authorities.
     

Other horror stories.  Earlier this year, Mark Fisher, a father from Shrewsbury, made national news when his 12-year-old daughter's sixth-grade class was asked in a classroom survey: "Have you ever given or received oral sex?"  Mr. Fisher also demanded to see the other questions, and the school refused to comply until great pressure was brought on them by the publicity.

Two years ago, Newton North High School gave a school-wide survey to all students during homeroom. Created by a national homosexual group, it contained the following questions:

What is your biological sex?       ___Female   ___Male

Which of the following category or categories applies to you (Check all that apply.)
__ bisexual    __ gay    __ heterosexual/straight    __ lesbian  
 __ transgender    __ not sure    __ other relevant category(ies).

Do you consider yourself to be a person with a physical disability?
__ yes    __ no    __ not sure

So you consider yourself to be a person with a mental or emotional disability?
__ yes    __ no    __ not sure

How do questions like these affect a child who's developing his own sense of emotional identity?  No one seems to care. These are actually cruel experiments.  We may not know for years how a child reacts to being asked to answer these questions.

Text of Bill S316:    (Link to official version on state website)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
------------------------------------
In the Year Two Thousand and Five.
------------------------------------
AN ACT Relative to School Surveys

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

SECTION 1.

Chapter 71 of the General laws, as appearing in the 2000 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding after section 32A the following new section:-

32B. No student shall be required to submit to a survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals information concerning: (1) political affiliations; (2) mental and psychological problems potentially embarrassing to the student or his family; (3) sex behavior and attitudes; (4) illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating and demeaning behavior; (5) critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships; (6) legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians and ministers; or (7) income, other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program, without the prior consent of the student, if the student is an adult or emancipated minor, or in the case of an unemancipated minor, without the prior written consent of the parent or guardian.


Lots of testimony at the State House in support of S316. At the September 22 public hearing at the State House, one after another came and gave testimony, often very emotional, before the Education Committee. No one came to testify against the bill!  But you can be sure that the opponents (i.e., the sex lobby and the homosexual lobby) will be working behind the scenes to try to kill this.